Sandlab
testing all the time
Testing all the time
Our not-so-secret sandbox to ask questions, try things out, and sometimes get it wrong.
Testing approaches or tools, creating solutions, bending methods to better suit them… With the rise of AI it's become even easier to quickly try things that puzzle us, to enjoy the luxury of getting it wrong, and to refine it all into something that works.
And when something works, why not share it with everyone!
Why Sandlab? We wanted a name that fits our identity: a scientific foundation that doesn't get in the way of creativity.
Tools we've built ourselves
UX Devil : l'avocat du diable de vos interfaces
Faire l'avocat du diable (new window) (opens in new window)Our studies
What if we no longer needed to interview real customers?
Replacing real users with an AI that answers in their place is an idea gaining ground on LinkedIn and among the people we talk to. We already had 1,000 real French people's answers to a cultural questionnaire, so rather than believe it or dismiss it, we put it to the test. Synthetic panels reproduce part of the answers, but they stumble on what makes fieldwork worth it: the doubt, and the “don't know”.
Dark mode: why is consensus so hard to reach?
Negative polarity, eye strain, performance, perception, eco-design: everything recent scientific literature teaches us (and where it contradicts us) about Dark mode, through the lens of the S-O-R model.
Measuring workload in UX research: lessons from the NASA-TLX
Lessons learned with the NASA-TLX, a simple, fast and proven questionnaire for characterising the workload associated with a product, an interface or a service.
Benefit from the French Innovation Tax Credit (CII)
Thanks to our official approval you can claim a 20% tax credit by investing in innovation, on the part of the project covered by our services: improving usability.
Learn more about the processAsking questions for our clients too
While this space mainly serves to test things and advance our approaches, above all it lets us put those results to work to improve the way we work with our clients.
See a selection of our case studiesR&D, a long-standing story
Research and innovation: we grew up in it and we love it. Nearly half the team chose to extend the pleasure of studying all the way to a PhD. So we opened our own R&D division: Flowtide.
Testing new methods, discovering new tools or opening up new markets… bringing you the best solution to your needs by drawing on our research capacity, our knowledge in neuroscience, in neuroergonomics, and more broadly in scientific experimentation.
Our main focus is the assessment of cognition through a psychophysiological approach: neuroergonomics. For instance, we measure cardiac activity through ECG, perspiration through electrodermal activity, or visual attention through eye tracking, to better understand human cognition.
We've worked on advancing our user tests, improving the performance of top-level athletes, and better analyzing user feedback (and all of it in no particular order).
The French Ministry of Industry also recognizes our ability to carry out research and innovation work, by certifying us as a private innovation body, allowing our clients to benefit (where applicable) from the tax credit linked to innovation spending.
We publish in the leading international conferences and journals
Yannick Daviaux, Dan Dutartre, Sami Lini, Fabien Lotte. 2021. 4th Dataquitaine Day: AI, Operations Research, and Data Science.
This presentation details our collaboration with the POTIOC team at the Inria research institute. We focus on the analysis of physiological signals to characterize the cognitive state of top-level e-sports athletes, in order to suggest training paths and performance improvements.
Christophe Bey, Sylvain Hourlier, Jean-Marc André. 2019. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.
La gestion des ressources cognitives est centrale dans le cas d'un processus décisionnel des pilotes. Nous entreprenons une étude impliquant des pilotes d'Airbus 400M et permettant de comprendre ces mécanismes et de proposer des recommandations pour la conception d'un outil d'aide à la gestion de leurs ressources cognitives. On constate que dans les cas les plus critiques et sous forte pression temporelle, le maintien de la maîtrise de la situation correspond à un comportement de type survie qui seul peut permettre un retour aux métarules (retour aux fondamentaux). Notre proposition de gestion de l'affichage permet au pilote de garder le contrôle de la situation quelles que soient ses capacités. Il permet une phase de stabilisation par une réduction de la contrainte, puis une phase de récupération « douce » du contrôle et la gestion de la mission sur de plus grandes dimensions spatio-temporelles.
Yannick Daviaux, Christophe Bey, Laurent Arsac, Olivier Morellec & Sami Lini. 2019, Dayton, Ohio, USA. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.
Modeling individuals' cognitive control levels in operational situations is a major challenge for safety in aeronautical industry. Standardized experimental tasks - as the Multi-Attribute Task Battery II (MATB-II) - are dedicated to such a challenge that can be faced using psycho-physiological biosignals. These biosignals are known to be sensitive to cognitive worload, performance, and expertise that are intricate features of MATB-II subtasks. Thus, it remained necessary to investigate whether these features could be set to ensure controlled experimental conditions.
Two groups (15 experts in time-pressured decision making and 13 novices) completed 3 MATB-II sub-tasks (tracking, monitoring, and resource management tasks). Biosignals accounting for autonomic nervous system activity were measured continuously, as objective markers of cognition.
Confrontation between performance data and (objective and subjective) cognitive markers reported contrasting perspectives regarding the exploitation of MATB-II as a pertinent tool to insure controlled experimental conditions in the context of cognitive control characterization.
Yannick Daviaux, Marc Lepagnot, Romain Lalanne, Julie Dumont, Sami Lini. 2018. 23rd Annual Congres of the European College of Sport Science, 4th - 7th July, Dublin, Ireland.
Team sport players have to divide cognitive resources when in multi-task situations: for example, when motor (driving a ball) and perceptual (gathering visual information on opponents) tasks are performed in the same time. We were interested in investigating if such improvement was also verified in rugby, where ball manipulation is not as much demanding (ball holding but not dribbling). We hypothesized cognitive training to improve on field performances in rugby players. Cognitive training should benefit to global performance also because of others global processes involves in motor command (decision making).
Yannick Daviaux, Sami Lini, Jean-Christophe Paris, Christophe Bey, Axel Johnston. 2018. In the Scientific Congress of STAPS Students of Bordeaux.
How the study of human performance sits at the centre of Akiani's work: we highlight the added value of knowledge, methods and tools used in sport sciences (STAPS) when combined with engineering sciences, and how this combination supports the innovation initiatives carried by the agency.
Céline Durupt, Charlotte Delcourt, Simone Morgagni, Sami Lini. 2018. In Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Spatial Cognition.
Literature has already well studied and proven the improvements of adding landmarks within pedestrian itineraries on both navigation performance and user confidence. In this ecological study, we evaluate the impact of landmarks in visual and verbal communicated route instructions to evaluate the efficiency of different information supports in two Parisian train stations and their complex urban surroundings using eye tracking technology.
Pierre Gilfriche, Laurent Arsac, Yannick Daviaux, Jaime Diaz-Pineda, Brice Miard, Olivier Morellec, and Jean-Marc André. 2018. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.
Frequency-domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV) have been used as markers of sympathovagal balance. However, they have been shown to be degraded by interindividual or task-dependent variability, and especially variations in breathing frequency. The study introduces a method to analyze respiration-(vagally) mediated HRV, to better assess subtle variations in sympathovagal balance using ECG recordings.
Thierry Bellet, Jean-Christophe Paris, & Claude Marin-Lamellet. 2018. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour.
The aim of this study was to analyse the difficulties experienced by older drivers during their regular driving, and to identify their needs and their expectations regarding Advanced Driving Aid Systems (ADAS) and vehicle automation.
Margot Beugniot, Sami Lini & Christophe Bey. 2017. EPIQUE Symposium.
The difference in performance between novice and expert tennis players is assessed through an experimental task. Using an eye-tracker and video on around forty players of varying experience, we evaluated the visual strategies employed during serves. Comparing performance and induced workload between the two groups shows the importance of spatial and temporal information, and the possibility of reducing novice players' induced workload through training.
Margot Beugniot, Sami Lini, & Christophe Bey. 2016. Eye tracking, Regard, Interaction, Suppléance Conference.
Using neuroergonomics to assess an operator's cognitive state has now proven its worth; could it also be used for operational training? In dynamic situations under strong time pressure, many studies have shown the link between expertise, anticipation, and situational understanding. We explore the possibility of leveraging that expertise to train novices, and specifically their visual perception during a tennis service return.
Sami Lini, Lise Hannotte, and Margot Beugniot. 2016. 3rd International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems.
What is the impact of a real time psychophysiological feedback on users' performance and cognitive workload? Does the display format of this feedback have an influence over subjects? What if the feedback provides erroneous data? We designed a protocol to compare the influence of providing a cognitive load assessment gauge versus raw data versus no feedback in a Multiple Objects Tracking task.